If a bellhousing is matched to a block, then the centerpoint of the bellhousing bore should be perfectly in line with the centerpoint of the block's line bore, i.e. perfectly in line with the rotating axis of the crankshaft. If a bellhousing is not matched to the block, then there will be some offset between the centerpoint of the bellhousing bore and the centerpoint of the line bore. Runout is a measurement of that offset, i.e. the distance between those centerpoints.
Last weekend I installed the crankshaft in my engine block. This took a bit longer that expected, due to the time to plastigage the main bearings, and the confusing directions I had on torquing the mains. In the end, I ignored most of the directions in favor of doing something that made some sense, instead.
You can see that I decided to go with studs for the mains, instead of bolts. The advantage of studs is that they provide more accurate and predictable torquing. There is less torque lost to friction, which means that more torque goes into stretching the bolt, which is what provides the clamping force to hold the parts together. Also, because friction forces can vary from bolt to bolt, reducing the amount of torque lost to friction also reduces variation in clamp load from stud to stud. This is all probably overkill for my application, but that's just kind of how I'm approaching this project, because it makes me feel good to know this stuff is in there, I guess.
So, once I had the crankshaft installed, that meant that I could measure my bellhousing's runout. Wednesday night, I took the engine off the stand and put it on the floor (upside down) so that I could install the bellhousing. Then I took a magnetic base, stuck it on the end of the crankshaft, and mounted a dial indicator to it so that its tip was resting on the inside diameter of the bellhousing bore.
The dial indicator does not need to be centered in the bore, as long as it is perpendicular to the wall of the bore, i.e. as long as it lies on the bore's diameter. I didn't notice until I looked at the picture above that I did not have the dial indicator perfectly perpendicular, but the good news is that this will only make the readings look worse than they actually are, not better. In other words, I might possibly get a reading that says I have a problem when I don't, but I can't get a reading that says everything's OK without everything being OK.
So, I turned the crank until I got a minimum reading, then I zeroed the dial indicator, then I turned the crank until I got a maximum. The maximum was 0.009", which gets divided in half to give a runout of 0.0045". You can see in the picture above where I marked the "0" point, and the ".009" point on the bellhousing.
Technically this reading is within the spec of 0.005", but only just barely. Also, the stock dowels are not really long enough to fully engage the aftermarket bellhousing, so I would have wanted to order some longer ones, anyway. I tapped the stock dowels halfway out so they would engage the bellhousing for this measurement, but I felt like I'd rather just have longer dowels for the final assembly. As long as I was ordering dowels, I decided to get 0.007" offset dowels, to try to improve the runout measurement.
Lakewood has some pretty slick offset dowels, which I ordered through Summit.
You can see in the photo below that one end is slotted, and the other end has a flat machined on each side of it. The slotted end is installed in the engine block, and the end with the flats is the dowel that locates the bellhousing.
If you look really, really, really, really, reeeeeally close, you can also see that the side with the flats is just ever so slightly shifted up in the picture, relative to the side with the slot. This is the offset that allows these dowels to shift the position of the bellhousing.
The slot on the end that gets installed in the block is there to allow some flex in that end. This allows you to very easily insert the dowel into the block, and clock the dowel to the correct orientation. Once the dowel is positioned correctly, there is a set screw that is tightened down, and this makes the slotted end solid so that it becomes a tight fit in the block that will not allow the dowel to rotate or slide out.
The picture above shows the set screw. The picture below is an end view of the set screw in the dowel. The four hash marks on the top side of the dowel indicate that that is the "high side," i.e. the bellhousing will be shifted towards that side of the dowel.
Below you can see the stock dowel, in place.
The dowels are pressed into through-holes, so they can be tapped out from the back side. Below, the block with the dowel removed.
The machined flats allow you to easily clock the dowels using a wrench, as shown below. Another advantage of the flats is that it gives you a place to rest an angle finder. I used one to measure the angle formed by the "0" and ".009" marks that I'd made on the bellhousing when I measured initial runout. Then I used the angle finder on the dowels' flats to set the dowels to that same angle.
Below is an end-on view of a dowel with the hash marks pointing down towards the "0" mark on the bellhousing. Shifting the bellhousing .007" in that direction should make the .009" reading into a .002" reading, and change the 0 to a 0.007" reading. So when the 0.002" reading is set as the new zero, then that makes the 0.007" reading into a 0.005" reading for the maximum, which gets divided by two to give a runout of 0.0025".
In actuality, the readings ended up being 0 at the old +.009" position, and only 0.002" at the old 0 position, for a runout of 0.001". This is even tighter than expected. I'm not sure why this is, but it may be in part due to the dial indicator not being perfectly perpendicular in the original measurement. You can see in the photos above and below that it is not perfectly perpendicular for these readings, either. Today I was careful to try to orient it along the bellhousing bore diameter, but I think it was actually leaning out somewhat, towards the camera, and the misalignment in these photos is partly a trick of the camera, due to the angle of the photo.
Anyway, regardless of these details, I feel good now that runout is as good as it is going to get, and well within the allowable tolerance.